This post of the latest WW1 campaign game is using for the most part the battle report (or AAR) structure I mentioned in a previous post (see here). I have deviated from the structure when it comes to photos which have easily exceed the constraint of 4 which I had originally had placed upon myself. Other than that it certainly got me thinking about providing more background to the game which is why I do enjoy campaigns, even simple ladder type campaigns like this one (campaign rules).
The assault on Magdhaba |
Background
In September 1916 the Egyptian Expeditionary Force (EEF) having received fresh troops and having extended both the light rail and water pipes supply infrastructure, was in a position to make its second advance across the Sinai Desert. The original EEF HQ plan was to launch an offensive in October, thereby providing another month for the new troops to become acclimatised to the harsh conditions, but London was insistent on a new offensive as soon as possible to follow up on their previous successes earlier in teh year (June 1916). The objective was to push on to the Palestine border. Turkish forces for the most part were being withdrawn to their defences around Gaza and their HQ opted for a limited counter offensive in an attempt to delay the anticipated advance by destroying key water supplies. An encounter of both forces unexpectedly occurred near the town of Magdhaba where both sides were trying to secure the water wells.
The EEF advance across the Sinai |
Order of Battle
Egyptian Expeditionary Force (EEF)
- 4 Infantry units
- 1 Infantry unit with supporting machine guns
- 1 Artillery unit
- 1 Armoured Car unit
- 1 Aircraft (once during a game an aircraft sortie can be carried out)
Turkish Force
- 4 Infantry units
- 1 Cavalry unit
- 1 Artillery unit
- 1 Mountain Artillery unit
- 1 Aircraft (once during a game an aircraft sortie can be carried out)
The Plans
Both forces are advancing on the town of Magdhaba. |
An early morning sortie by EEF aircraft spots the advancing Turks. |
The Turkish force was the first to gain entry to the town of Magdhaba and quickly took up defensive positions behind the town ready to feed in reserves as required. In response the EEF quickly deployed its units with the armoured car unit providing protection on the left flank to deter any interference from the Turkish cavalry. Their artillery moved onto the nearby hill and prepared to provide supporting fire. Although they were initially bombed by Turkish aircraft. The attack on Magdhaba then began in earnest...
The Turks are able to gain control of the town and both sides deploy their units. |
The Battle
The EEF made multiple and sustained assaults throughout the day and moved units around on both town flanks. These actions were not without loss, the Turkish artillery units were able to destroy the armoured car and inflict casualties on the flanking units. The Turk plan to hold the town was proving to be successful until those supporting forces came under fire from the flanking EEF units supported by their artillery, which the Turks had failed to suppress. As evening was beginning to close in (turn 13 of a 15 turn day) the Turkish infantry vacated the town and it was open for the EEF to occupy.
Turkish forces struggle to reinforce the town as EEF units assault from three sides. |
The EEF finally manage to take control of Magdhara. |
An EEF victory, which will allow them to consolidate their capture of the Sinai and move up to the Palestinian border were the Turks wait in prepared defences.
The rules used were a variant of One-Hour Wargames (OHW) Machine Age rules where units have to pass activation tests to move and shoot. A draft version of the OHW rules and modifications are written up here.
So pleased to see you break free of your self-imposed AAR constraints. I like it more like this... :o)
ReplyDeleteI ended up doubling the photos, but always knew that would be a difficult constraint to adhere to. The structure about background, plan and the game was useful.
DeleteAnother nice little action there Peter and as always, a joy to behold. I like the inclusion of background to a battle, which I try to do for my games, as it gives them a setting and reason to be fighting, which I find really adds to the feel of the game.
ReplyDeleteThanks. Yes, having a background (written or in your mind) for the games is both useful and adds to the game's enjoyment.
DeleteA fine battle report Peter, this style is spot on I reckon.
ReplyDeleteThank you. It was another enjoyable scenario (#16) from OHW.
DeleteGreat game report. I'm struck once again how nice those scratch-built vehicles and aircraft look on the tabletop.
ReplyDeleteThey were so much fun to build and paint. Thanks.
DeleteExcellent report Peter and a fun looking game.
ReplyDeleteInspired by you I have got my copy of the OHW rules and am looking forward to running some games.
One thing I do in my reports is to have all the photos from the same angle. I think this makes it a little easier to follow. But then I am old and dense :)
Thank you. Agree a consistent angle does help with understanding what is happening on the tabletop.
DeleteHi Peter. that looks like a nice game a fun project. 😁
ReplyDeleteIt was a close game and could have gone either way.
Delete