Over the past week, I opted to step away from gaming with my samurai armies and instead brought out the classic 30mm Spencer Smith Napoleonic plastic miniatures for some tabletop action. Back in November last year, I shared a couple of posts (here and here) about my attempts to adapt SPI's free board game, Napoleon at Waterloo, to a tabletop setting with free movement rather than hexes. The reason for wanting to move to this style of rules is so I can game some of the bigger battles of the period.
Since last playing the games back in November I have made some rule changes, most of the changes are to the combat resolution table (CRT) which uses the difference in the attacker and defender scores, rather than the combat ratio.
The sequence of play is IGO-UGO with each player taking a turn to move and conduct combat with their units in the following sequence:
Finally, subtract the defending score from the attacking score to determine the CRT column to use. Then roll the die to determine the combat outcome.
- Move units
- Move HQ (General)
- Resolve Combat
- Remove units with more than 4 hits.
During the movement phase a player can attempt to move some or all of their units. A unit may move up to the distances listed below in a straight line provided the unit is not within 3 inches of an enemy unit. In which case a unit must remain in contact and cannot move.
- Line Infantry and Artillery - 6"
- Light Infantry - 9”
- Cavalry and HQ - 12"
Units may pass through other friendly units providing they are not within 3 inches of an enemy unit, and all Units must cease movement immediately once they are within 3” of an enemy unit.
Note - A unit’s facing does not matter in the game currently. This is something I may add, but was not in the original SPI rule set.
Units may only move into contact with the enemy if they are within 24 inches of an HQ. This is reduced to 12 inches after 50 percent of the army’s units are eliminated.
Combat - Any enemy unit within a 3-inch of a player’s unit must be subjected to an attack, even if it results in one unit confronting two enemy units. All units, excluding artillery, have a range of 3 inches for combat, while artillery have up to a range of 12 inches and can shoot over other units at targets. Artillery when making a ranged attack over 3 inches will ignore any attacking hits.
An example of how using artillery to attack one enemy unit, allows both line infantry to make a +1 attack (2 units - 1 unit with no modifiers) |
A combat results table (CRT) is used to determine combat outcomes. Add up the total of attacking units, ignoring any light infantry units, and add the total number of defending units, modifying the scores in the following situations:
- Add one for any line or light infantry unit in buildings.
- Add one to the defenders if all the attackers are fighting uphill or across a fordable river.
- Add one if veteran unit is involved.
- Add one if the attacking units are a mix of line infantry and cavalry.
Note - Light Infantry are only counted when defending.
CRT Notes:
- A1, A2, A3, A4 - all attacking units take 1, 2, 3 or 4 hits.
- D1, D2, D3, D4 - all defending units take 1, 2, 3 or 4 hits.
- (R) all defending units must retire 6 inches, pushing other friendly units back in the process if necessary.
- A1/D1 - all defending units and all attacking take 1 hit.
- Light infantry can opt to retire 6 inches and reduce their hits by 1 unless being already forced to retire.
- Artillery making a ranged attack over 3 inches ignore any attacking hits.
- When a unit retires or is eliminated, one of the attacking units can move into the previous enemy position.
Some combat examples below…
A joint attack by cavalry and infantry allows them to make a +2 attack (2 units +1 for a combined attack = 3 - 1 unit with no modifiers) |
A joint attack by light infantry and infantry. They only make a 0 attack (+1 -1) as light infantry do not count in attacks. |
2 line infantry make a +1 attack. Unfortunately for them they roll a 1 (black die) on the CRT. The result is an A1 so they both take 1 hit. |
The next post will be a game report of an engagement battle using deployment ideas from the free 2x2 Napoleonic rules.
A final close up photo. |
Thanks for the close up s of the figures
ReplyDeleteI was so inspired I bought a load of Spencer Smith Napoleonics last year and 3 by 3 bases
Unfortunately the moulds have nowbeen sold and the new owner hasn't got them ready yet
I need some cavalry
Thanks for the best blog on the web
Classic simple wargaming
Hope the relocation to NZ wi reduce your wargaming
Kind regards
Pete
PS as I write I'm looking at some Spencer Smith prussian infantry
Simple painting and gloss varnish
I did see the range had been sold, hopefully they will be available soon, as like you I need a few cavalry, specifically Hussars, just because I really like the figure. The move to NZ will impact my wargaming later this year and I will be restricted to skirmish size games with a handful of figures. Good luck with your Prussians. Cheers, Peter
DeleteFantastic pictures Peter - looks like a great game.
ReplyDeleteThe game scenario was loosely based upon the battle of Caldiero 1805. Thanks.
DeleteThanks for reply
ReplyDeleteJust reading what I wrote
Predictive text leads to terrible miscommunication
Love the photos
Did you use the SS Prussian for Austrian infantry?
Pete
Yes more cavalry
I like the lancer
Thanks. yes, I the used the Bavarian infantry (NP8). But I have mixed up many of the figures and converted some ACW figures.
DeleteInteresting looking game Peter and great figures.
ReplyDeleteThanks. More photos of the figures in the next post.
DeleteLove the final close up photo, as it's very evocative and has a lovely 'old school' feel to it:).
ReplyDeleteYes, definitely an old school look. Thanks.
DeleteIt certainly offers up an Old School vibe. Excellent looking table, Peter. You always provide something to think about.
DeleteThanks Jon. I am quite enjoying using the CRT approach for combat at the moment.
Deletenice looking set up. though 3" seems like very short range (just my in initial reaction). 😁
ReplyDeleteI did try 6 inches for musket, but found 3 worked better for the game.
DeleteI always come away from your posts educated and entertained by your thoughts and creativity Peter, and this was no different.
ReplyDeleteThanks Richard. I have found it really interesting and enjoyable reworking the boardgame for the tabletop.
Deletethe game looked really good, I'm looking forward to following posts
ReplyDeleteThanks, the game is setup and ready to be played this weekend.
DeleteLooking good, Peter. I will most certainly be trying these. Can't wait. The troop stands look excellent, also.
ReplyDeleteI will be posting up the rules soon.
DeleteExcellent! The sooner the better :-)
DeleteSome very nice ideas and mechanisms in here peter - I thought quite recently, that TtS and FK&P might actually be improved by doing away with flanks - as its almost impossible in those rules, on a gridded table, to avoid having an insecure flank. In board games (I am assuming) the scale of the action/units involved means flanks etc are "abstracted" out of any calculations?
ReplyDeleteThe original boardgame had no flanks, as you say all abstracted out, but units could not retreat into an enemy zone of control.
Delete