While I don’t want to be dealing with supply in the tabletop game, I do want supply to be reflected in the campaign game mechanics as supply was a major factor in the North African campaign. Something both sides had to deal with.
The Desert campaign lends itself to a linear campaign approach. What better starting point is there than KISS Rommel campaign rules to get inspiration for the map layout and approach. These are available on https://freewargamesrules.fandom.com/wiki/Freewargamesrules_Wiki.
Campaign map drawn using felt tipped pens and colouring pencils for shading. The map is divided into zones for the inner campaign. |
In terms of timescale, each campaign move represents 1 month. During each month’s turn players direct the supplies they receive to one of three areas:
- Launch an attack
- Prepare defences
- Reequipping units
The flow of supplies can be interrupted and must be diced for each month. A D10 dice is used to determine this. Axis forces get supplies 80% of the time and Allied forces 90% of the time. I don't quantify the volume of supplies, armies are either supplied or not supplied, and the areas represent the focus of supplies.
Each side has five counters representing their forces grouped at a divisional level. This is where the one bit of paperwork is used to track divisional losses and recovery throughout the campaign. Both sides line up their divisional force counters on the board. The campaign begins with Allied and Axis forces positioned at Tobruk, the centre point of the linear campaign.
Campaign forces. |
- Prepare defences - No battles occur for the month. When battle does come the defending player’s units will have prepared positions and minefields.
- Reequip units - No battles occur for the month. Players attempt to recover lost units for all their divisions.
- Launch attacks - When both players decide to attack roll the dice to decide which player attacks, if scores are drawn the Axis player is the attacker. The losing player’s supplies will instead be directed to reequipping units.
Once an attacker is identified the best of three tabletop games are played to determine the result of the attack. However, before these games occur there is still some campaign activity to occur. Both players pick up their divisional counters and reposition them face down. The attacking player then reveals their counters and selects the division which is acting as the spearhead of the attack, and the opposing enemy unit on the map is revealed.
Both sides reposition their forces and the defending forces are concealed. |
The units on the defending side are only revealed after an attack is declared. Divisions may only attack their opposite number. |
Units in prepared positions behind minefields. |
Regardless of the result, the attacking player players chooses the next division to be involved in the next battle. This maybe the same division that fought previously. The same process applies as before when setting up the battle. Note: a defending division which has lost a battle and is attacked again cannot deploy improved positions and minefields.
Up to three games can be played during the campaign turn. If the attacker wins two games they advance one step on the campaign map the loser retires one step. As soon as a defender wins two games the attack is called off and neither side moves on the campaign map.
These are draft rules, but they are at a point where I can soon start my campaign and tidy them up as I go along.
Another interesting campaign on tap for us! As always, your maps are beautiful and I look forward to following along as you work your way through the Western Desert.
ReplyDeleteThanks. I had to use a larger piece of paper as the map could not fit on a standard sheet of paper.
DeleteGreat looking campaign Peter - as Jonathan said, fantastic Map.
ReplyDeleteThank you. It took a while to do the map, but an enjoyable activity.
DeleteExcellent ideas here.
ReplyDeleteThere is some groundbreaking work going on in your blog Peter.
Thank you. The rules are draft and may need a few modification, but that is part of the enjoyment.
DeleteMaintaining your usual high standards Peter. Simplicity. Efficiency. Low maintenance. Ticks all the boxes.
ReplyDeleteThank you kindly. The next post will cover the orders of battle and the one bit of paperwork required.
DeleteTruly amazing, Peter, I can't wait for campaign kickoff! I think the campaign map is beautiful, as is your now hex-based table, and I love the idea of using KISS Rommel as the baseline, and how you've modified it. I can't wait to see how it plays out.
ReplyDeleteYou've already inspired me once: I've run a very simple 10-game campaign (WWII Germans vs Commonwealth in Greece, 1941) based on your WWII British Guards vs German PzGren. I had a blast, very enjoyable, just have to get the batreps typed up and posted!
V/R,
Jack
Thank you. Hopefully there are some useful and reusable ideas, or remind people about the wonderfully simple KISS Rommel rules upon which inspired this campaign.
DeleteLol. I wind wire around a small dowel, rather than taking the springs from pens.
ReplyDeleteIf supplies are interrupted, then an army holds position. It will defend when attacked, and if it has improved position from a previous month they benefit from them.
Fascinating stuff Peter and really look forward to seeing how this all plays out. As always the maps are a joy to behold!
ReplyDeleteThanks. It took a while to get the right effect on the map as it looked a bit blank and uninteresting to begin with.
DeleteI like the neat, simple logistic rules and the whole look of the game.
ReplyDeleteRegards, Chris.
Thanks. I am sure the rules may need the odd tweak as I progress the campaign.
DeleteBrilliant! And infuriating! You have a real knack of hitting all the bases with these campaigns - a skill I sadly lack. Mine start with your foundations and then founder on added layers of chrome.
ReplyDeleteSo immediately I am thinking 'what about the open flank?' Perhaps an attacking win there opens up the next defender in the line to an attack by the flanking division, losing any prepared position benefits?
Excellent, attractive map, as others have said. Looking forward to how this develops.
Thanks for posting.
Cheers
Andrew
I find writing down draft rules for this blog helps streamline my rules by forcing me to reassess the rules as I write, and secondly the few rules the easier it is to write up for this blog.
DeleteI did consider open flanks, then decided the battles on my tabletop will be about forcing that breakthrough in the defences for the outflanking which forces the campaign retreat.
Love it, thanks for sharing! Have you ever considered play am online campaign where people (by twitter or facebook or this blog, using a pool with some options) are your enemy in the strategic side of the campaign? You still would have to play the tactical games by yourself, but, I think it could be interesting.
ReplyDeleteThank you. In the past I have played a French Indian War campaign where all campaign moves were made by Jonathan, a fellow blogger, and I played all the tactical games. Essentially, we both played solo and the results flowed between games.
DeleteAs for an online campaign, I did briefly consider it, but would need to firm up the rules which are still yet to be proved.
It would be great. Count on us!
ReplyDeleteThanks!
Delete