Not much painting time during the week as I am still fairly busy with other non-wargaming activities. However, during the week I was mulling over ideas for some rule variations to the One-Hour Wargaming Medieval rules. The variations are to do with army organisation, unit activation and unit elimination. Today I was able to try them out on the tabletop.
A game underway |
The unit activation ideas are similar to the approach taken more recently with my English Civil War (ECW) rules where the army organisation dictates how units are activated (see here). As with the ECW rules I found one book to be very useful is shaping the approach. In this case, it was the book "Medieval Warfare" by Terence Wise.
“It was usual to divide an army into three divisions, called Battles, with the light troops occasionally operating separately under their own commander. The three Battles are generally referred to as the Vanguard (Vaward Battle in England, Avant Garde in France), the Main Battle and the Rearward Battle. The three Battles always marched in this order and normally deployed for battle with the Main Battle, the most honourable command and usually led by the king or his deputy, in the centre; the Vanguard on the right as the second most honourable command; and the Rearward Battle on the left. Where there was insufficient room for such deployment the Battles might be placed two in the front line and one in reserve, or in three successive lines.” (Medieval Battles, Terence Wise)
Assigning Units to Battles
My medieval games generally have between 15 to 20 units per side. At the start of the game a player's units are assigned to 3 to 4 Battles:
- Vanguard Battle
- Main Battle
- Rearward Battle
- Skirmisher Battle
The first step of the game, before getting to the tabletop, is for a player to assign their available units to the Battles and Command, and there are a few of constraints placed upon the player:
- All Battles must contain at least 1 men at arms unit (foot or mounted).
- The Main Battle cannot have less men at arms (foot or mounted) units than either the Vanguard or Rearward Battle. An equal number is allowed, but not less.
- The use of a skirmisher Battle is optional and if used, can only contain bowmen with a maximum of 3 units.
Battles are deployed |
Deploying Units on the Tabletop
Battles and their units are deployed on the tabletop in a set order. Unless specified in a scenario, players begin by rolling the dice to decide who begins the deployment, re-roll any ties. The winner, player A, starts the deployment.
- Player A deploys all units in their Vanguard Battle
- Player B deploys all units in their Vanguard Battle
- Player A deploys all units in their Main Battle
- Player B deploys all units in their Main Battle
- Player A deploys all units in their Rearward Battle
- Player B deploys all units in their Rearward Battle
- Player A deploys all units in their Skirmisher Battle (if used)
- Player B deploys all units in their Skirmisher Battle (if used)
A Battle's units must maintain coherency when deployed and during the game. This means all units must be positioned to be within 12” of all other units in the battle.
I play on a 6’ by 4’ tabletop and units must be placed within 18” of their base edge.
Sequence of play
During a game turn each player will have the opportunity to activate all their Battles and Commands. The order of activation is unknown as cards are used to determine the order of activation.
At the start of the game add a card for each Battle is placed into the Activation card deck. At the start of each game turn the Activation deck is shuffled and placed face down. The top card is drawn and the owning player gets to activate all of that Battle's units. Then the next card is drawn and the identified Battle is activated. This continues until all cards are drawn. Then the activation cards are shuffled and placed face down for the next game turn.
As a solo player I like this random activation approach to the Battles. A book quote again:
"The main problem seems to have been not the fighting quality of the troops, but the inability to maintain discipline over them once battle commenced..." (Medieval Battles, Terence Wise)
The idea of using cards comes from the "Never Mind the Billhooks" rules by Andy Callan. Except all units have the opportunity to activate with the approach used here.
The Activation card deck determines the order of activation. |
Activating Units
When a Battle or Command is activated, a player can activate each unit within the that Battle:
- First move any of the units
- Shoot with any units that did not move
- Melee (Hand-to-hand combat) where any unit is in contact with the enemy.
Battle Fugitives
When units disintegrate they do not disappear from the battlefield and can have adverse effects on other units they run into. So when units are eliminated upon taking 15 hits. Before the eliminated unit is removed, any units directly behind and within 12" the eliminated unit are marked as disordered from the fleeing troops. Units marked as disordered cannot move or shoot until they remove the disordered marker with their next activation.
A unit of bowmen is eliminated. Directly behind them 2 units within 12" become disordered from the fleeing bowmen. |
I got the idea of battle fugitives from the old SPI game Agincourt. Although the rule mechanisms are very different, I did like the disruptive concept of fugitive troops delaying troops behind them.
A final photo of a game in progress |
Very interesting Peter. I do have a hankering to get my medieval plastic stuff completed. These rules look very interesting. Activation deck is simple yet subtle.
ReplyDeleteThanks. As a solo wargamer I find the approach helps to give an enjoyable, and occasionally, unpredictable game.
DeleteI like your ideas, Peter. I can't wait to see test game on the tabletop!
ReplyDeleteHi Peter, I do like the card activation for solo wargaming. It certainly adds some randomness and friction to a game.
ReplyDeleteGreat looking game too 😊
I like the approach for solo gaming.
DeleteYour activation system seems perfect for the medieval period and also for solo play. The disruption of nearby units by troops that break and rout is something that should be incorporated in more rules; just removing broken units as if they had teleported off the battlefield may be simple and easy, but isn't realistic. Another good idea!
ReplyDeleteI think I will be adding the break and rout rule into some of the other rules, particularly the ancient rules.
DeleteSo have we an imminent Medieval campaign to look forward to?
ReplyDeleteA Samurai campaign may be my next campaign.
DeleteWell thought out so far as it goes. Some nice concepts. 😀
ReplyDeleteThanks. A bit more work to do and a few more test games required to try them out.
DeleteInteresting stuff. As it happens I am writing up my game with 'In Deo Veritas' , which uses a card draw to decide the order of activation for 'wings' of a 17th Century army in a similar way, and I thought it worked pretty well, gave a nice level of uncertainty and good for solo play.
ReplyDeleteI like the cards approach as all units get an opportunity to activate, just not necessarily in the desired order.
Delete