Deciding tabletop terrain layouts for AWI

While I am happily playing a few games of WW2 as part of my campaign, I thought I would throw in an AWI game over the next week or two. As mentioned a couple of posts ago I will be trying out randomly generating terrain for some of my one-off games. My current method for positioning terrain works well for WW2 Northern Europe games, but might be more problematic for AWI games because of unit scale and the choice of battlefields by the armies, which required a certain level of open ground for their unit formations.

My immediate thoughts were to do the opposite of what I currently do, which is to increase the terrain features in the centre 16 squares based on the campaign map area being fought over (The rules for this are in a series of posts call WW2 mini-campaign). Thereby, reducing the potential clutter of some types of terrain, particularly woods, in the centre of the board.

Beginning the setup of terrain using a random method

Another approach is to keep the current random method, but to treat open ground as a terrain feature. Now an open terrain feature could be something like three squares by three squares on my gridded table (or 18 inches square) and comes with the advantage of a centre square to help positioning. A couple of these open ground terrain features would be positioned first using a random method, and only certain terrain such as hills, fields and buildings can be placed on these open areas. There may even be a limit of one piece per open terrain feature.

Two open terrain features are randomly laid out first. Their centres must be within the marked centre area.

The remaining terrain is all randomly positioned anywhere on the table with one field allowed in an open terrain feature.

The above pictures show a trial run which seemed to work. Some additional rules included were no terrain features are allowed in any squares adjacent to a building feature (except roads) and fields come in pairs, rolling for the first one and laying the second field north, south, east or west of the first one.

The other ingredient is the order of placement: 2 x open terrain, 1 x roads, 1 x buildings, 2 x paired fields, and finally 8 x woods.

I will need to consider other features such as marsh, ravines, roads, etc. Along with the numbers of features allowed.

WW2 campaign game and a little bit more on terrain

I managed to get a game in during the week for my WW2 campaign. I have stopped calling it a mini-campaign as by my calculations I'll be playing some 20 odd games before its completed.

German reinforcements repulse an attack

This week's game had Commonwealth forces making a full scale attack between the towns of Fontaine and Colombo-Sur-Thaon. The campaign square being attacked meant the tabletop terrain  would have a river and additional woods. Very defendable and so a full scale attack seemed appropriate.

The campaign map

More Commonwealth reserves arrive to attack the second bridge

The game turned out to be very interesting. Firstly, because the German reserves arrived very late after the had ceded a bridge and were hanging on by the skin of their teeth. While Commonwealth reserves were trickling in very nicely and taking advantage of no German reinforcements. The reinforcements did eventually arrive en masse and quickly shored up the defences and nullified all the attacks. The Commonwealth forces were at risk of losing the bridge they had taken and for some reason the remaining reserves had been held up. When their reserves did arrive, including an aircraft sortie, there were just enough to additional units sway the game and claim victory.

The final few turns sees a Commonwealth win

Following my recent post about randomly generating terrain for the tabletop, there were comments with some interesting suggestions. I will be incorporating these into my campaign rules (for future campaigns) and for setting up terrain for one-off games. Thank you to those who commented, it's much appreciated.

Some of the ideas to be incorporated are:

• Placing one or two terrain features after both forces have deployed on the table.
• Remove some terrain after deploying forces on the table.
• Adjusting some terrain after deployment of forces, especially is there are only a few features.
• Both sides move a terrain feature (not everyone is a solo wargamer)

I'm certainly going to be doing more random terrains as I find whenever I layout terrain it is all to balanced (read boring) and after all nature itself is somewhat random.

Deciding tabletop terrain

This week I am trying to get a couple of WW2 games in as part of my campaign. For each game the terrain is randomly generated based upon the terrain type in the campaign zone (described in some posts a few weeks back). I am finding this approach to deciding the placement of terrain features is generating some very interesting tabletops to game over. The layout of the table is often such that I would never think of placing the terrain features that way myself. I'm now thinking I will continue to use this approach with some of my one off games, and to add a twist I will withhold one or two pieces of terrain which get randomly placed after troops have been deployed to create surprises.

The random generated terrain is positioned

All terrain features are added

More gaming with Swatters ruleset

Having tried out some different combat and shooting mechanisms earlier in the week which worked in a fashion, but at the same time seemed to go against the grain of the Swatters ruleset. I decided to go back to the original rule mechanism and have another look. It was probably laziness on my part that took me down my first path of using multiple dice.  I also spent some time glancing through Mutants and Death Ray Guns, Flying Lead and Of Gods and Mortals looking for ideas (over the years I have collected a few rules based on the Song of Blades and Heroes rules).

Orks press forward as the space marines try an out flanking move

Anyway, after a couple of tryout games sticking as much as possible with the rule mechanisms and using adjusted special rules. I found I settled on an approach which for me seems to work for me and the W40K models I use.

For shooting:

• I don't graduate the range. It's either in range of not.
• Flamethrowers +2 against troops at range 6" and in combat.
• Support Weapons (e.g. Heavy Bolter, Assault Cannon) +2 against troops range 24". Cannot be used in combat.
• AT support weapons (e.g. Plasma Gun, Lascannon, etc) +2 against vehicles and monstrous creatures range 24". Cannot be used in combat.
• Pistols (Boltpistols, Stormbolters, etc) range 12".
• Automatic Guns (Bolters, Lasgun, etc) range 24".
• Missile Launcher +2 against all units at range 12". Cannot be used in combat.
• Grenades range 6" against vehicles and monstrous creatures.
• Veteran leader (e.g. space marine sergeant) +1 to units shooting and combat.
• Hero +2 (e.g. space marine commander) +2 to units shooting and combat.

To calculate the effects of shooting both sides (shooter and target) roll 1D6 and add the above. The defender cannot add any weapon benefits. If the defender scores more or ties, then they can return fire if they are suitably armed. Otherwise, remove target unit casualties up to the winning margin:

1 point for a lightly armoured figure (2 if in cover)
2 points for a power armoured figure (3 if in cover)
3 points for a terminator armoured figure (4 if in cover)
4 points for a light vehicle or creature (e.g. land speeder)
5 points for a medium vehicle or creature (e.g. Dreadnought, Rhino)
6 points for a heavy vehicle or creature (e.g. land raider)

For combat:

• Talons and claws +2 against troops
• Large claws/power fists +2 against troops and vehicles/creatures
• +1 if outnumber opposition
• Some weapons (see above) can be used.
• Cover is ignored

Combat calculation is the same as shooting, but with no cover allowed. If no casualties are inflicted roll again until a side suffers casualties, except against vehicles/creatures where only one attack is allowed.

A Killa-Kan bites the dust

Next week I will be getting back to my WW2 campaign and hopefully completing a couple of games.

Playing around with Swatters rules

A few weeks back I had a game of Swatters, a set of rules from Ganesha Games, which provides an enjoyable game between Tyranids and Space Marines. The rules are geared towards bugs vs. marines, but there are suggestions for using the rules in other settings. So this week I have been playing around with Orks vs Space Marines and introducing vehicles.

The area of the rules I am playing around with are combat and shooting. Here is a quick list of ideas I'm trying out...

All units get to roll 2D6 when shooting regardless of unit size. Any 3+ removes a partially armoured figure, 4+ an armoured figure, and 5+ a heavily armoured figure. Any 6 that is rolled allows the shooting unit to select the figure removed.

• Maximum shooting is range 24"
• Intensive Fire activation add 1D6.
• Minus 1D6 for cover or if attacking a vehicle.

If the unit has other weapons, then only one of them can be used.

• Support weapons add 2D6 against non-vehicles (heavy bolters, assault cannons, etc)
• Missile Launchers add 1D6 regardless of troops or vehicles
• High Power (AT) weapons add 2D6 against vehicles

Vehicles and monstrous creatures are hit on a 5+ and lose a hit point. Their size determines the number of hit points.

Reactive fire at the shooting unit is allowed after casualties are removed and a successful activation.

Combat (assaults) occur when units are within 6" and have successfully activated. Both sides roll  2D6 simultaneously and the side with the most number of casualties retires one move and the attacker moves into the vacated space. Any ties, then repeat the process.

• If the unit is armed with close combat weapons add 1D6 (unless assaulting a vehicle)
• If the unit makes a powerful attack activation add 1D6 (unless assaulting a vehicle)
• If the unit has a flamethrower add 1D6
• If the units has power weapons add 1D6

I am keeping the same unit size and rules for when a unit only has two models, but whether you have 3,4 or 5 models does not influence the D6 rolled.

Whether or not I do much more with these rule modifications I'm not sure, but I will be using the rules again for Tyranids vs Imperial Guard or Space Marines. A worth while investment for the PDF rules (about the cost of two coffees).

WW2 mini-campaign starts

This week I managed to get a couple of campaign games in. The first of the games was an all out attack by commonwealth forces which they successfully won. Quite a safe option to begin the campaign. The German forces had the option of the next battle and they chose a limited attack.

A Commonwealth attack successful and push forward the frontline. 

I was expecting a much a close battle in the second game. Commonwealth forces fielding 15 units having rolling 9 on two average dice to add to the 6 units given to the defending player. While the German total was 20 units with a score of 8 added to 12 units for a limited attack.

Commonwealth units

German units including a Aircraft

However, the terrain setup was to prove problematic for the defining side, two building squares had ended up next to each other. Successfully contesting these or capturing one of these would win the game for the attacker.

Tabletop layout randomly generated

The game turned out to be one sided. The Commonwealth units were gradually pushed back to defending the village as they waited for their reserves to show up. They were eventually whittled down and the village was occupied by German units. The late arriving Commonwealth reserves attempted to retake the village, but the excellent dice rolling by the German side continued and the counterattack failed.

Germans advance across the fields and towards the village 

A lack of reserves and poor dice rolls has the Commonwealth forces in retreat

Attempts by the late arriving reserves fail to retake the village

From the last couple of games I have updated a couple of areas in the rules for: 1) unit reorganisation and 2) aircraft sorties. The change to reorganisation is aimed at forcing disrupted units to retire when there is no supporting units nearby.  The aircraft sortie rule is me just continuing to play around with the rule until I am happy with it and to make it sufficiently different from being just another form of artillery. To this end aircraft can only attack vehicle based units with quite devastating effect unless they are supported by AA guns.

WW2 mini-campaign part 5

With the tabletop set up completed, the next and final stage is to decide the size and types of units for each player, and get them on to the table.  The first step for both players is to calculate the number of units they command. They do this by rolling two average dice each and add to the combined dice score to:

• 6 when defending
• 12 when making a limited attack
• 18 when making an all out attack

Now that the number of units known, each player rolls one D6 for each unit they are allowed and selects a unit based on the score. The higher the D6 score the more choice they have, players can if they wish select a unit which is lower than their dice score.

• 6 = heavy tank, unit aircraft (attacker only) and defences (defender only)
• 5 = tank unit, armoured infantry and armoured reconnaissance
• 4 = self-propelled guns (AT or artillery) units 
• 3 = guns (AT or Artillery), motorised infantry and light reconnaissance (forward observers)
• 1 or 2 = infantry and mortars

Only one aircraft can be selected by the attacker and the defender can only select one defence unit. A defensive unit consists of a pillbox and 3 minefield squares.

A defensive unit with 3 minefield squares

Not all units will start on the table. For both the defending and attacking players half their units begin in reserves. If there are odd numbers the additional unit is placed on the table. Both players are allowed to choose which units begin in reserve and which go on the table.

The units in reserve are lined up in the order a player wants them to arrive. These units can start arriving from turn 2 onwards on a roll of 5+. If a 5+ is rolled then one unit arrives, if a lower score is rolled then the unit is parked and will arrive on the next if a 5+ is rolled along with the next unit being rolled for. This way units often arrive in batches. 

For example, if a player rolls 4 on turn 2, 3 on turn 3, and a 6 on turn 4, then on turn 4 three units will arrive from reserves.

Reserves are lined up waiting to move on to the table

The other half of units are placed on the table